|
White Paper & Bio
Privacy Management for Enterprises in a Global Economy Privacy management
for multinational companies tends to become challenging due to a complex
web of legal requirements, distributed business activities and the
movement of data and business operations to cost effective locations
in the world. Third party outsourcing has become widely used and adds
another layer of complexity both for the outsourcing and the insourcing
company. The insourcer for example needs to treat data from a number
of source countries according to the specific requirements at these
sources and needs to observe them throughout the lifecycle of the
data. In addition an insourcer will have to fulfill its contractual
obligations to the outsourcing companies which can lead to further
requirements for the technical and operational aspects of a solution.
Some companies have in addition been discussing to move from a liability
based model (in which the focus is what one legally has to do) to
an accountability based model in which ethical concerns and broader
privacy risks (e.g. reputation risks) should also be taken into account.
In a global enterprise privacy concerns need to be addressed by numerous
teams. If one looks at outsourcing as an example these are sales teams,
compliance teams, solution engineers, process engineers, implementation
teams, operations people on the ground and even after the solution
has been delivered privacy concerns, still need to be addressed on
an ongoing basis, e.g. during change management (say, when data center
are moved.)
Known technical point solutions, e.g. encryption technologies, auditing
tools are of course important but will often address only a small
part of the overall privacy concerns that a practitioner has. This
raises the question which automated tools could provide the corporate
privacy teams with practical assistance in solving this more holistic
problem.
The position taken here is that one major component of an overall
solution has to address the management of privacy knowledge, policies,
requirements and controls themselves. I believe that there are no
tools out there helping privacy teams doing that today. Ideally these
tools will help the businesses to answer the privacy issues they have,
identify the technical and procedural controls relevant to them and
to allow them subsequently to manage the privacy requirements and
controls they have identified. It would be enough that the output
of such a tool is intelligible and actionable for humans and not necessarily
be automatically executable in enforcement engines.
Other useful tools for a global privacy management are deidentification
tools that are applicable to data in different formats (from free
text to structured data, images or scanned invoices etc), e.g. for
outsourcing scenarios.
How to design products in a privacy-aware, i.e. which and how privacy
engineering principles should be applied and how "Design for Privacy"
could be integrated into the product design lifecycle is another interesting
challenge.
The position taken in this paper is that the development of tools
for global privacy management could be very valuable in enabling corporations
to implement good privacy standards across the board more effectively.
Research work in this area will benefit from collaborations of computer
scientists with researchers who have specialized in business processes
and experts on the international privacy legal landscape.
|
|
Dr.
Tomas Sander
Hewlett-Packard
Labs
|
|
|
Biographical Data
Dr. Tomas Sander is a research scientist at Hewlett-Packard Labs
in Princeton, New Jersey. He is a member of the Trusted Systems
Lab at HP which conducts research in trust, security and privacy
technologies. Before joining HP, he worked for STAR Lab, the research
lab of InterTrust Technologies in Santa Clara, California on a broad
range of topics relevant to advanced digital rights management (DRM).
Tomas Sander received a doctoral degree in Mathematics from the
University of Dortmund, Germany in 1996. From September 1996 to
September 1999 he was a postdoctoral researcher at the International
Computer Science Institute in Berkeley, California. He founded the
ACM DRM Workshop in 2001. His research interests include privacy,
computer security, cryptography, electronic commerce and digital
rights management.
|
|